|
|
|
San
Francisco Examiner, March 8, 1964 - by Kenneth Rexroth
If you
want to learn easily and objectively, while being entertained, what has happened
to the human race in 200 years, go and see the movie Tom Jones at the
United Artists, and next evening, the live play, The Ginger Man at
the Encore.
By and large, pictures that move don't move me, but Tom Jones is close
to the best that the industry can do. It is a landmark in the history of cinema,
as they say in the highbrow reviews, which means that it does not insult the
intelligence of an adult.
Fielding's
novel Tom Jones has been called one of the three greatest tales in
the history of literature. It set the basic type for the plot of the novel
of self realization. Tom discovers himself. He finds out, in the course of
a series of remarkable adventures, who he is. It is not just that he learns
his true parentage and realizes his potentialities; he discovers what he really
is, himself for himself alone. . . his ego center, as our 20th-century headshrinkers
put it.
This is the plot of James Joyce's Ulysses and his Portrait of the
Artist as a Young Man: it is also the plot of the best novels of F. Scott
Fitzgerald, and of dozens of other famous works before and since.
In addition, Tom Jones is the greatest of the English picaresque novels,
the classic type of the kaleidoscopic adventures of a lovable rascal. Once
in a while the picture gets a little flashy, but by and large it is honest
and clear. Clear is the word for Fielding, his characters have an uncanny
clarity, as though we were watchiug real people from behind an invisible sheet
of glass.
The Ginger Man is also an adaptation of a novel. It has enjoyed a limited
reputation amongst the most judicious critics ever since it appeared, as the
best of the novels of the English Angry Young Men.
Possibly this is because the author, J. P. Donleavy, is neither English nor
angry. He is an Irish American and as full of fun as an old time professional
bar fly from Paddy McGinty's Beer Parlor. His association with the AYM is
due to the fact that he was abroad and part of their circle when the novel
was published. Comic he may be, but it is with a gallows humor.
If Tom Jones is the type English picaresque novel, The Ginger Man
is the anti-type. Its thesis might be described as a demonstration of the
utter impossibility of being Tom Jones in a contemporary city. Its hero, Sebastian
Dangerfield, is a rascal, true enough, but he is an empty rascal, and he gets
progressively emptier, until he becomes just a sort of hole in the story.
Tom Jones is an entrepreneur, Sebastian Dangerfield is a delinquent. Fielding
wrote a mocking story of 18th-century man on the way up, the type of the emerging
capitalist class, as the Marxists would call him. Before he got far with his
tale, he was overcome with admiration for his own invented hero. Donleavy
wrote of the adventures of the same kind of youth, in a time when history
has made him redundant, and so Sebastian Dangerfield is just a sociopath.
It is not that he goes down hill morally, it is that he gets in the literal
sense of the catch phrase - "absolutely nowhere." Imagine, if you
can, a funny Journey to the End of the Night.
And yet Sebastian is lovable, as so many characters on Death Row are. He rouses
every motherly instinct, and all our philosophical pity for the senseless
waste of existence. He is just another of the billions of codfish eggs that
never hatched in the bosom of the sea. But more than that, drunken, crooked
and slyly effeminate, he clings to the masculine clarity of vision that made
the author if not the hero of Tom Jones great. He steadfastly refuses
to call things what they are not. Far more than Henry Miller's heroes, his
honesty is shameless and stark, and so his lack of sham judges all the sham
with which we garb our own actions.
Bawdy as it is, there is something very evangelical about The Ginger Man.
It is a retelling of the story of the Emperor's New Clothes. The Emperor in
this case is that figure St. Paul used to call "the ruler of this world,"
where "this world" is that immense category that St. Paul used to
link with the flesh and the devil.
I've been so busy talking about what these two tales mean that I have said
nothing about The Ginger Man as a play. It was dramatized by Donleavy himself,
and he missed none of the salient points of the novel. The play, in fact,
more compact, has more impact. Tom Rosqui, Erica Rosqui and Robert Benson
have a great good time. They are lucid, forceful and enthusiastic. Priscilla
Pointer, who seldom gets a chance to do broad character roles, is hilarious
and must be seen to be believed.
--KENNETH REXROTH
Copyright
1964. Reprinted by permission of the Kenneth Rexroth Trust |
|